On 10/11/20 1:17 PM, nusenu wrote: >> I am losing patience with the "let's play nice and let exit IP addresses >> be predictable" model... We are not being treated well by the banhammer >> brigade, and it might be time to flip some tables. I would not call >> simply using a different exit IP than your relay's OR port a bad exit. > > I'm not calling exit relays using distinct IPs or inbound (OR) and outbound > connections "BadExits" either, quite the opposite, all exits should be using > https://2019.www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en#OutboundBindAddressExit > if they have spare IPs. > That is why I implemented and automated that configuration in relayor.
Ok that sounds reasonable. Thanks! > I believe I can tell rerouting exits from exits having distinct IPs for > inbound and outbound connections - in most cases. Are your scanners available for others to run? I understand that it is a risk that making them public may allow bad exits to avoid them, but is it ok if other specific people use and adapt the scanners? >> Remember that our directory authorities are deliberately independent >> from TPI though, and even what I think is not necessarily what TPI >> thinks. The dirauths may have different opinions. Coordinating policy of >> this nature is difficult and requires consensus building. > > Since dir auths have been removing these kinds of relays, I don't think there > is any policy change necessary. Ok great! Sometimes I am surprised by their decisions, and I didn't see this one. -- Mike Perry
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays