On 8/5/2011 4:42 PM, Martin Fick wrote:
--- On Fri, 8/5/11, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org<berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org>
wrote:
http://www.technologyreview.com/communications/38207/?p1=A1
It's worth reading the paper:
I think that simply getting high profile sites to run to r
nodes would be more likely and less invasive to the internet
as a whole. If google were to simply run a bunch of
bridges, or even known tor entry nodes, that would likely
be more reliable and be less pie in the sky.
If you compare the advocacy it would take to get enough
ISPs to implement this scheme versus the advocacy to get
a few high profile (can't live without them) sites to run
tor nodes, I suspect the latter would be much easier.
-Martin
You lost me at "If google were to..." Google & privacy is the
definition of an oxymoron. They're way down the list of organizations
many users would want having any role in some anonymity endeavor.
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
