On 8/7/11 3:11 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > Before you (or someone else) start to even think about hijacking > traffic, which is against mostly everything the Tor project stands for, > apply or help us apply for grants. There is a large number of grants a > Tor exit node operator, especially if it's an officially registered > non-profit organization like ours, could apply for. We just don't do so > at the moment for lack of time.
I agree, but the premise of that thread was that this approach could: a) leverage ethical and legal issues b) could be unfeasible So i am not pointing out if "it's good to do it or not" but if it would be "feasible or not" and in which proportion . Let's make some hobbyist study on it and evaluate how 'an adv based tor sustainability model' would work on a spreadsheet :-) At least to know the hypothetical cost/return ratio: With 100GB of tor traffic, how much GB of additional Tor traffic you could buy? -naif p.s. see you at ccc camp, i am at Italian Embassy in front of French Embassy _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
