On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:12 PM, coderman <[email protected]> wrote: > ... the very design trade offs they make to > support larger numbers of contains per host directly reduce the > networking performance and capacity of any singular container/vm.
note that design trade-offs in favor of speed also reduce the security / strength of isolation between host and guest. speed / throughput alone should not be only consideration. as to the question which work well or poorly as Tor routers, too many factors for a simple yes or no. on a spectrum of best to worst try this ranking, with the usual caveats of how context dependent views are: -BEST xen vmware kvm vserver virtuzzo virtualbox qemu-kqemu openvz uml qemu-softmmu ---worst with the added caveat that many low end virtuozzo, openvz, uml hosting are too constrained to run a useful relay. _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
