Thus spake Erinn Clark ([email protected]): > * Erinn Clark <[email protected]> [2011:09:05 15:01 +0100]: > > However, as of Firefox 4, there is a pref called extensions.enabledScopes > > which > > allows you to define the scope of plugins and limit them to things like > > "just > > this profile", "just this app", "just this user", etc. In the current TBBs > > it > > is limited by profile (the most limited and mandatory scope) but it seems to > > behave somewhat unpredictably. It used to be that it did not even show all > > of > > the plugins, now it shows them but you have to enable them. I should look > > into > > this to make sure there isn't another pref interfering. > > > > You can read more about this here: > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Addons/Add-on_Manager/AddonManager#Installation_scopes > > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/extensions/AddonManager.jsm#1238 > > Okay, I misspoke here. It doesn't actually show all of the system plugins, but > it seems to show some? I would like to hear reports about how a vanilla > Firefox > plugin list looks compared to our Firefox on users' systems, because although > I > have access to a lot of VMs, none of them are tarted up with plugins right > now. > > Does it show none, some, or all? Is there any consistency to which ones you > see?
Btw, I plan on bypassing this enabledScopes setting and solving this a different way. I hope to have the solution ready by the end of the week: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3547 -- Mike Perry Mad Computer Scientist fscked.org evil labs
pgpAiaywUJM0j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
