Am 15.11.2011 07:52, schrieb Runa A. Sandvik: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Mike Damm <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Monday, November 14, 2011 9:30 PM, "Runa A. Sandvik" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> The Tor Cloud project gives you a user-friendly way of deploying bridges >>> to help users access an uncensored Internet. By setting up a bridge, you >>> donate bandwidth to the Tor network and help improve the safety and >>> speed at which users can access the Internet. >>> >>> Setting up a Tor bridge on Amazon EC2 is simple and will only take you a >>> couple of minutes. The images have been configured with automatic >>> package updates and port forwarding, so you do not have to worry about >>> Tor not working or the server not getting security updates. >> >> https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#MultipleRelays says: >> "Great. If you want to run several relays to donate more to the network, >> we're happy with that. But please don't run more than a few dozen on the >> same network, since part of the goal of the Tor network is dispersal and >> diversity." >> >> I'm curious to know if 'MyFamily' is properly set on these instances, or >> if Tor plans to bucket all instances within EC2 as part of the same >> family? >> >> Assuming this is a non-issue... looks very awesome! > > A bridge should not specify the ‘MyFamily’ option. You won't run a > middle relay or an exit relay in the cloud, so this shouldn't be an > issue. >
As far as I understand, this is correct if you only run bridges (because a circuit never uses two bridges), but what if someone (like me) runs a bridge and a normal relay as well? IMHO you don't want to use a relay which is operated by the same operator as your bridge? Please correct me, if I'm wrong. Jan _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
