> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:36 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Am 2012-01-19 15:52, schrieb [email protected]: >>>> How to correctly answer into an existing tree? >>> >>> By correctly setting the "In-Reply-To" and "References" headers of your >>> mail. "In-Reply-To" is to be set to the value of the "Message-ID" >>> header >>> (the message ID) of the mail you want to reply to. "References" >>> contains >>> a list of message IDs: the message ID of the mail you're replying to, >>> the message ID of the mail that previous mail is a reply to and so on. >>> >>> Unless you're using a completely broken mail client, your mail client >>> will do that for you automatically if you use the "Reply" or >>> "Reply-all" >>> functionality. > > I'm curious what your MUA is doing when you click reply and reply all > on this list.
For your and mine curiosity I'll pressed reply this time. (The two times before I used reply all.) > Does the broken threading happen on other mailing lists > or just this one? Haven't tested any other mailing lists using tormail.net. > This mailing list violates RFC 2822 and munges reply-to headers. I > wonder if this has anything to do with what you have been seeing. No idea. _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
