Fabio, You hit it! Finally I am happy to read agreement. Maybe a campaign should start? Little Snitch and Hands Off developers: I will switch to your product if support for socks diversion comes!
PS Hands Off has filesystem control for apps, I think -- Jerzy Łogiewa -- [email protected] On Oct 6, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: > Hi Agree, > > there is generally a serious lacks of high usable applications for > application sandboxing from both filesystem and network operations point > of view. > > I hate advertising a commercial product, but Handsoff is a very good > example of highly usable/security application for Mac. > > If they would add a "Divert to Socks" = "Anonymize" option, it would > make the stuff you're asking for. > > In general i think that the world lacks a free software for Windows or > Linux or Mac OS X that allow the end-user to create it's own "Sandbox > profile" for it's "Applications and operating environment". > > That's a major issue, especially for Linux users where, as far as i > know, there's not even a commercial alternative providing the right > balance between Security and Usability in handling sandboxing. > > As a result most Linux user i know run a most unsecure environment > respect to Client Side attack surface than most Mac OS X and Windows > user i know that instead use Application Protection suites for sandbox > their clients application. > > That is the real problem! > > -naif _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
