I think there is some misunderstanding. Child pornography without child means video whose character looks under-19-year-old or wears a school uniform and animation whose character looks under-19-years old.
However, there are a few sexual scenes in video, the video is child pornography. There is no principle. If south Korean police want to arrest netizen who download that video, they do it even Korean is democracy society. 2012. 10. 21. 오전 5:24 Julian Yon <[email protected]> 작성: > On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:27:13 +0100 > Julian Yon <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm not quite sure what "child pornography without child" is meant to >> mean, but I don't think you're going to find much support for child >> sexual abuse (real or faked) on this or any other public mailing list. > > Apparently I was wrong about this. *sigh* I guess I have to put up with > more emails matching /child.*porn/ in my inbox, and hope the police > don't add that to their list of reasons to harass us here in the UK. > > -- > 3072D/F3A66B3A Julian Yon (2012 General Use) <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > tor-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
