I think you're right.
On 04/13/2013 04:32 AM, Gregory Disney wrote:
OnionCat? Anything more extreme than that is going to have be built from
the ground up.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Alex M (Coyo) <[email protected]> wrote:
On 04/13/2013 01:54 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
Alex M (Coyo)<[email protected]> wrote:
>I must have somehow missed it.
I would really appreciate a link. I cannot seem to find it on my own.
Thank you in advance.
Here are the common ways: roll a bunch of bridges using Amazon's cloud
[1], have friends/allies/interesting frenemies run bridges using Vidalia
[2], or just use a garden-variety VPN/proxy before entering the Tor
network.
~Griffin
[1]https://cloud.torproject.**org/ <https://cloud.torproject.org/>
[2]https://www.torproject.org/**download/download.html.en<https://www.torproject.org/download/download.html.en>
That is extremely unhelpful.
Merely running bridges on a huge ridiculously insecure public cloud does
not equal running bridge authorities independent of the bridge authority
run by the tor project.
I have still not gotten a straight answer about whether or not the bridge
community featureset has been released in the stable tor client.
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
