Issuing this hypothetical warning/status alert on check.torproject.orgwould certainly have the highest positive user impact.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Low-Key² <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jon Tullett <[email protected]> > > > Personally I'd still like to see a message front and centre on the > browser > > homepage too... > > This isn't a bad idea. Or, more specifically, why not use the existing > javascript/no javascript routines in HTML on check.torproject.org to warn > users of possible security ramifications from having javascript enabled? > That might be the easiest method to continue packaging the Tor Browser > Bundle as currently done without dealing with any negative feedback > claiming that people are uninformed of the risks possible through > javascript exploits and, thus, are left insecure by default. > > -- > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] > To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > > -- > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] > To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
