On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:18:31 -0700 bm-2d9whbg2vekslcsgbtplgwdlqypizsq...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
> Despite this transparency on Tor's own website, Tor's "Sponsors" page > at https://www.torproject.org/about/sponsors.html.en currently lists > its largest donor as "an anonymous NGO." > > Isn't SRI "an anonymous North American NGO" only in the sense that > Halliburton or Lockheed Martin could be considered a North American > NGO? For the record, I haven't updated the sponsors page for 2012 yet. On my todo list. Second, "an anonymous North American NGO" isn't SRI, it's someone else we can't list due to contract legalities. The smart investigator will figure it out. In all cases, the financial statements and filed forms are the canonical source for information. They're filed with various US and Swedish Government agencies and are legally binding. The website sponsor page is trying to distill 50+ pages of dense forms for the lay person. In the future, opening a ticket, https://bugs.torproject.org, is a fine way to raise the issue as well. Bonus if it comes with a patch. -- Andrew http://tpo.is/contact pgp 0x6B4D6475 -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk