@ioerror "@jamesrbuk Stop suppressing the story on Tor." @ioerror "@smarimc @guardian The Guardian is sitting on a story about Tor - I'll do one better: @jamesrbuk refused to show us the story/docs."
this begs two questions: 1. is this story pending polish and expected to be published at some point in the near future? [alan rusbridger says Tor story not suppressed?] 2. if this story truly is suppressed / killed, is it because of undue, over broad US/UK government pressure, or is it because the story included detailed technical aspects of how Tor is monitored[0] in the context of international counter-terrorism and other "data sharing"? who else or what organizations might be able to compel some guidance in the case of reality of #2? 0. by technical details of Tor analysis, this may cover capabilities such as, traffic confirmation via active interruption of client networks, or protocol attacks leveraging relays under their control for circuit manipulation, or even widespread circuit linking via prevalent points of privileged access to backbone links and internet facilities monitored by the intelligence community. -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
