David Goulet wrote (05 Nov 2013 21:08:33 GMT) : > In terms of new naming, I would personally *love* that but we have to be > careful with package that depends on torsocks and one comes into mind, > "parcimonie". So, if we decide that a new name is a good idea, packaging > needs to consider the transition and possible breakage.
At least for parcimonie (which I'm upstream for), I'm pretty sure we'll manage to talk to each other and provide a good transition path :) Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
