I'm not saying it's secure enough for illegal activity but it could download a couple of pirated ebooks or whatever people want. Just keep a Java Back end. Yeah there would be logs. Not anonymous or secure but eh it's so useful. On Jan 13, 2014 10:11 AM, "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Il 1/13/14, 4:17 PM, Nathan Suchy ha scritto: > > Explain what you mean by reach your mirrored and why would I get a > > complaint for proxy service? I already do this and many others do too > with > > ease. Google protects it's members. > Some comments on this idea: > > * It's not possible to prevent Google from logging the access to the Tor > Hidden Service and to provide those access logs following an authorized > request from a governmental agencies, thus possibly exposing > > * It's not possible to configure the SSL/TLS Ciphers of Google App > Engine, so the connection could not have Perfect Forward Secrecy > > * Google App Engine does not let you have an always-on process server > side, enforcing a maximum execution time (last time i checked, some > years ago, it was 30 seconds) . Tor connection process keep some time in > order download the descriptors, connect. So it may create some > additional load over Tor network by the need to connect and disconnect > to the Tor network and does some Guard/Directory traffic. > > So i'd consider to be careful in which kind of "use case" are defined > for such kind of project, especially when compared to Tor2web > > -- > Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) > HERMES - Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights > http://logioshermes.org - http://globaleaks.org - http://tor2web.org > > -- > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
