On 06/17/2014 01:14 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just FYI, basic statistics for the performance of Alexa's top 50 >> websites via Tor are here[1]. I'll be reporting additional results on >> Tor.SE[2] (no flames, please) but not here. >> >> [1] >> http://dc445.4shared.com/download/VaNzp5mlba/Top_50_Websites_via_Tor.png?lgfp=3000 >> [2] >> https://tor.stackexchange.com/questions/949/what-common-sites-are-known-to-be-troublesome-for-tor-use > > Data! And the base2 is nice. A similar binning of page size on either > side of its stddev might detect excursions into blocking splashpages/notices. > I just note the column headings are 50x redundant, > a bit tighter could make reading easier. > > headings > site data data ... > site data data ... > ...
Thanks :) I did the headings that way because I was thinking about adding charts. But now I agree that tighter would be better. With more data, I could test for multimodal distribution. I'm now collecting data as well with links2 and wget, both spoofing Firefox in Windows 7. -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
