Krishna, Please. You are a PC repair guy who can install Linux.
Regards, Mark McCarron > Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:10:28 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and > Anonymity > > (tl;dr: humor, no content) > > On 14-06-30 02:14 PM, Mark McCarron wrote: > > Mick, > > > > I would be very careful what you claim in your emails. I have the > > capability of suing you into oblivion, that email constitutes defamation. > > Nothing like that was ever said, either retract it or I will take you for > > everything that you've got. > > > > Your choice. > > > > Regards, > > > > Mark McCarron > > There was nothing in Mick's email a regular wiseguy on the street > wouldnt have quipped after reading Mark McCarron's unsupported > assertions, certainly nothing legally actionable. > > Mark has succeeded in proving something, however. > Namely that he is clueless as well as full of, erm, bluster. > I hope for his sake none of his colleagues, multi-million dollar > employers or clients, read these threads. > > > > > > Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:11:50 +0100 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and > > Anonymity > > > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:05:06 -0400 > > [email protected] allegedly wrote: > >> > >> I have a hard time believing that you've been effectively tracking so > >> much 'child porn, rape, snuff videos' content that you can > >> conclusively say that all such content has suddenly disappeared from > >> Tor. My knowledge about the way that kind of content works is, that > >> no one person would be able to access much of it unless they were a > >> creator/trader of the stuff. Such a person would be trying to be > >> low-key about it out of fear for themselves, not posting in this list > >> and seeming to admit to having been tracking that content. So - - not > >> a match, for whatever reason. > > > > Interesting point. In many, if not most, countries the very act of > > accessing such material is illegal. Yet, McCarron, in his post of 25 > > June, admitted on this public email list that he now had difficulty > > accessing "the more serious categories, such as child porn and > > violent sexual material". > > > > That strikes me as stupid. Certainly it is not "low key" as you say. > > > > Mick > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Mick Morgan > > gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312 > > http://baldric.net > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > -- > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
