Thanks, George. Interesting proposal and an area I hadn’t considered to be an issue. I will look again at the HS process and review links in more detail.
Yours sincerely Mike Fikuart IEng MIET Mobile: 07801 070580 Office: 020 33840275 Blog: mikefikuart<mikefikuart.wordpress.com> Skype: mikefikuart<skype:mikefikuart?call> Twitter: mikefikuart<https://twitter.com/#!/MikeFikuart> LinkedIn: mikefikuart<http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikefikuart> On 18 Aug 2014, at 10:54, George Kadianakis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Mike Fikuart <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> writes: Hi Tor-Talk, I am interested in the scaling limits to Tor and what present the bottlenecks to Tor’s future expansion. I have looked into the documentation available and see that Tor has far exceeded initial projections through structural changes to the relationships between clients, DA’s and relays. Hidden Services have trouble scaling. We've been thinking how to build availability in them by allowing multiple nodes behind a single HS. There are many threads about this in [tor-dev]. A good starting point is: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2014-April/006788.html along with the threads it references in the beginning. -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
