>> This could be combined with a change to HTTPS Everywhere to prefer >> HS sites over clear web sites, just as it prefers HTTPS over HTTP. >> (I think this has been mentioned before?) > > You mean like what we've been doing over on > https://github.com/chris-barr/darkweb-everywhere? :)
I knew it was being discussed somewhere, although I'm getting a 404 on that page at the moment. > The above tool (granted I have a *very* clear bias) is why I am not a > fan of the "make a hidden service be a reverse proxy to another > website". I'm not comfortable with transferring expected ownership of > a website for a number of reasons, which is is why we try to vet every > site included. > > I'm very big on asking websites, especially those that are censored, > to run a hidden service as a way to protect their users and as a way > to make them more censor resistant. I think the lack of interest has > started to go away now that Blockchain and Facebook have implemented > one, since I haven't been getting the usial "Well we don't block > Tor..." response. Maybe we can get a big news organization to run one > for a proof of concept? Yes, a reverse proxy would just be a tool to help an organisation transition into running a HS, and should be performed in conjunction with the organisation. This should be part of a campaign to encourage organisations to participate in Tor. I think we're pretty much in agreement here. -- kat -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
