On 12/03/15 20:23, Nick Mathewson wrote: > Hi! > > Do you like to build allegedly stable versions of Tor from source code > and try them out looking for new bugs? > > If so, head over to > http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/volatile/tor-sha256sum.txt.asc > > There is a GPG-signed document listing the sha256sum digests and URLs > for a couple of packages that *are not yet* official Tor releases > 0.2.4.26 and 0.2.5.11, but which might soon be. Check the signature, > check the digests, and give them a spin! > > I'm especially interested in regressions -- that is, bugs that are in > 0.2.4.26 but not in 0.2.4.25, or bugs that are in 0.2.5.11 but not in > 0.2.5.10.
I built a Debian package from these Tor 0.2.5.11 sources (with the Debian packaging for 0.2.5.10 added), and then built a Tails image with it, and ran our full automated test suite, which of course involves a lot of Tor usage. I'm happy to say that no regressions were found so it looks like a solid release, as usual. Good job! Cheers! -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
