MaQ writes: > Also, while it was said that .onion encryption was of lower standard, > wouldn't a high degree of privacy and randomness still be assured, > except for maybe alphabet agencies and more nefarious types out there > specifically targeting a subject or .onion addresses in general, and > some serious work and resources would have to go into pinpointing and > breaking said encryption?
I think it's reasonable to guess that cryptographic attacks would be extremely expensive, so most prospective attackers today wouldn't try them. -- Seth Schoen <sch...@eff.org> Senior Staff Technologist https://www.eff.org/ Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/join 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109 +1 415 436 9333 x107 -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk