> I would add to the list, that offering read-only access would be nice. > So just delivering the cached content instead of the captcha, would be a > very easy solution in that direction.
I like that one. Just to be concrete, the idea is that if the URL is already cached, to spit out the cached version. But if a cached version does not exist, cached version exists, to spit it out, but if a cached copy does not already exist, to return the captcha? -V On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:07 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Virgil Griffith (2015-10-03 01:40:22) > > Presuming they are > > unwilling to completely drop the captcha, what would be a step in the > right > > direction? > > I would add to the list, that offering read-only access would be nice. > So just delivering the cached content instead of the captcha, would be a > very easy solution in that direction. > -- > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
