Thanks a lot for the clarification. fre. 18. mar. 2016 kl. 17.00 skrev Sebastian Hahn <[email protected] >:
> Hi there, > > different threads on this list have already begun popping up about > today's 0700 UTC consensus. The reason is that the dirauths did > not produce a consensus that was signed by all 9, but rather the > vote was split (this happens sometimes and usually causes no great > concern). The dirauth dannenberg was on the winning side of split, > so the produced consensus had just 5 signatures, the minimum > required amount for a consensus to be valid. Unfortunately, its key > changed recently and that change has not yet been communicated via > a new Tor stable release. Thus, any Tor not configured to trust > dannenberg's new key would've rejected the consensus as signed by > just 4 directory authorities. > > Now that all 9 are in agreement again this problem is gone and there > should be no more logs appearing from this incident. > > Cheers > Sebastian > -- > tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
