https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/the-forest-for-the-trees.html

The Forest for the Trees
Monday, 13 June 2016
By isis agora lovecruft

It feels rather sardonic to say this now, openly, after two years spent 
alternating between trying to inhibit my rage and convince myself that I hadn’t 
been hurt, followed by seeking out other victims, in order to develop the 
collective capacity to defend ourselves and to have the simple ability to speak 
out in a manner which would be heard and not discarded.


I’m Forest. Here’s my story, as submitted to the anonymous site 
jacobappelbaum.net:

"Jake and I had been friends and coworkers for years. Looking back on it, I’m 
not sure why. From the very first Tor developer meeting I had attended, he 
repetitively propositioned my partner and I for sex. He even went so far as to, 
on the very first meeting on the first morning, in front of all the other 
developers — whom I had not yet met — tell me that he was okay with my partner 
and I fucking in the same bed as him while he watched, causing both of my 
partner and I to feel completely humiliated that our private sex life was being 
discussed in front of colleagues we had hoped to build a good start towards 
friendly, professional relationships.

While travelling, the first time he came to the city I lived in, I invited him 
to stay at my house. As politely as I could, I explained, “You can have the 
floor, and I’ll take my bed, or the other way around. If you’re comfortable 
with it, we can share my bed, as friends. Meaning no physical contact.” We both 
slept in my bed.

That turned out (mostly) fine. (Except, of course, being propositioned again, 
this time for a threesome with Jake and one of my roommates.) In fact, Jake and 
I proceeded to share beds in a friendly manner over the years, and nothing bad 
ever happened.

Once Jake had moved to Germany, I came to visit friends there for a while, and 
one night I stayed at Jake’s place. Again, we shared a bed, as friends. There 
weren’t even any discussion or attempts beforehand to convince me to do 
anything sexual with him. It was freezing cold, and I went to bed with several 
layers of street clothes on.

Sometime around 5 o’clock in the morning, I woke up very confused and startled 
because my pants were unzipped and Jake’s arm was wrapped around me, his hands 
in my underwear and he was rubbing my clit and rimming the edges of my vagina. 
I tried to shove him off me and wake him up. He’s physically much bigger than 
me, so the shoving didn’t work as well as it should have, but nonetheless he 
rolled over, a bit exageratedly, mumbling as if asleep.

In the morning, I confronted him about it. I was really confused. I didn’t know 
if he was actually asleep, but if he was, how did my clothes come undone? 
Assuming that if I was super confrontational about it, he’d have some excuse 
like “Oh, but I thought it was okay that time because you didn’t explicitly 
give me the we’re-just-friends lecture before bed…” When confronting Jake about 
this, I said, “Dude, what the fuck. You started fingering me last night.” It 
took a few seconds for there to be a reaction on his face, and then he seemed 
confused, saying “Oh… what? I don’t remember that.” I glared at him.

The really disconcerting thing for me was that, half an hour later, he said, “I 
thought you were her.” Here, “her” was Jake’s fiancée. At the time, she didn’t 
live in Germany, and they hadn’t seen each other in weeks. Jake’s fiancée was 
also gorgeous and super curvy, and I am basically a scrawny, little twig. “I’m 
not sure how you could confuse us, even asleep.” I said. He continued muttering 
some excuses about having wet dreams about her. He seemed to suddenly and 
extremely vividly remember whatever dream. Nowhere did he say, “I didn’t put my 
hands in your panties,” nor did he apologise."


Transformative Justice is not the “Death of Due Process”

First, some backstory is in order.

Seven or eight years ago, I was involved in an anarchist collective process for 
a male person in an anarchist activist community who was accused of and 
eventually admitted to raping two anarchist women. Since none of us would turn 
him in to the police, we gave him a choice of either leaving or going through a 
rehabilitation programme which we would create, in an attempt to transform him 
into someone just as capable of contributing in all the productive ways he 
already was but without harming other people and decreasing their abilities to 
contribute and to do so safely. We warned him that, if he skipped town, I would 
personally hunt him down to whatever city he ran to, contact the anarchist 
organisers there, and attempt to give them (as non-biased as possible) an 
account of the events. He didn’t run.

At first, he participated grudgingly, but later he broke down crying in front 
of the two victims, apologising sincerely and begging them for forgiveness. As 
part of the rehabilitation, one of the things we determined to be cause for his 
behaviour was a very negative self-body image, i.e. he was quite overweight and 
under the impression that women “only like dudes who are ripped”. Part of my 
responsibilities in the rehab process was to go to the gym with him, to help 
him have better body image, demonstrate that not all women are into “dudes who 
are ripped”, and help him become more comfortable with the idea that women are 
intelligent creatures as opposed to being merely some sexual object to be won 
over. He eventually successfully convinced both us and the victims that he 
would not abuse anyone else. To date this has been successful, and he’s had 
healthy relationships with several partners, including a transperson.


The Plan

When I first started seeking out other victims, about six months ago, I did not 
want to formally report any of the stories I had heard from Jake’s victims to 
the Tor Project or others, for two primary reasons. First, that my main 
motivation in this was to ensure that these behaviours stopped, and it was not 
clear to me that any traditional punitive “justice” measures would achieve 
such. Second, I feared retaliation from Jake, as well as retaliation towards 
any of the victims whose stories I would divulge. Multiple victims at the time 
expressed that they didn’t want me to tell The Tor Project, later admitting 
they feared retaliation to be extremely likely, as well as difficult to combat.

Instead, I had planned to gather people for a secret meeting in Valencia, 
somewhere calm, neutral, and away from events, like on the beach, invite Jake, 
and have everyone willing who has ever been sexually assaulted, humiliated, 
harassed, or felt their boundaries disrespected, by him to take turns telling a 
few sentences about what he did to them and how it made them feel. Then we 
would tell Jake that, as his friends, we thought this needed to stop, and that 
we’d either deliver a list of the stories to The Tor Project and other 
organisations, or make all the stories public, if he refused to hold himself 
accountable for his actions or his behaviour did not appear to improve. In 
planning this secret meeting, I tried to determine what would cause Jake to 
perpetually disrespect other people like this, and if there were any positive 
things we could do to help him.

Somehow Jake got word of all this, and proceeded to go back and forth between 
everyone I knew, starting, it seems, with one of my roommates and a reporter 
acquaintance, to force information out of these people, including more names of 
more people involved (to force more information out of). He seemed to have put 
the whole story together from all the bits and pieces he was given. In between 
my efforts to get work done and give a lecture, he imposed on me that my ten 
minutes of coffee break time should be spent speaking with him, because it was 
An Emergency. During that rather one-sided conversation, Jake described all the 
time, effort, and ways he was using in order to completely ruin someone’s life 
who had attempted to stand up to him, as well as previous ways he had managed 
to get someone fired from their position and ostracised. He pointedly 
mentioned, several times, the names of multiple people who he had destroyed in 
the past for standing against him. In his current efforts to harass one of 
these people — which through backchannels I was already aware of, he said, 
“I’ve literally been spending 15 hours a day on this. […] I’ve been speaking 
with an investigative journalist team to make sure they don’t believe [that 
person]. […] I heard there was a plan to ‘Confront’ me in Valencia. If that 
happens, I probably will not take it very well…”

This was chilling. Why was Jake saying those things, non sequitur and without 
provocation? It was clear to me that they were thinly-veiled threats, 
descriptions of what would soon happen to me. If I stood up to Jake, I could 
expect him to try to get me fired from The Tor Project. To try to block my 
acceptance into the doctorate research program he knew that I was, at that 
point in time, applying to. To feed the media stories about what a horrible 
person I am. To ostracise me from my social circles.

In all of this, I tried to do the right thing, to ensure that no more people 
were harmed, to give Jake one more chance. I wanted the anarchist, 
rehabilitation-focused solution, but Jake had only responded to that with 
threats. Meanwhile, River and I were introduced through a mutual friend. When 
Jake threatened me, I was, for a moment, frightened. Then I flew into a fucking 
rage. Sorry, Jake, but attempting to blackmail me into silence whilst I was 
defending others is really not a good look for an “anarchist” “free-speech 
advocate”.

Having run out of ideas and being threatened out of alternative options, I 
reported everything to the rest of The Tor Project. Well, almost everything. 
Originally, I only reported others’ stories (with their permission). I left my 
own story out, and I did not tell it until it was decided that Jake would no 
longer be part of The Tor Project.


The Trees

This isn’t about any one individual’s story. This is about addressing the 
issues and finding means within our communities to ensure this doesn’t happen 
again. This is about building communal structures so that it does not require, 
as Jake has rather entertainingly called it, “calculated and targeted attacks” 
from victims who otherwise felt alone and powerless to stand up and fight back.

Photo: Clara Zetkin and Rosa Luxembourg, early women’s rights activists, 
marching at a demonstration, arm in arm.

I have spoken personally with every person whose story was published in the 
original set on the anonymous site. I am convinced beyond reasonable doubt that 
each of them is true. I added my own story to the site in solidarity with the 
other victims, especially these who remain anonymous, as someone with the 
social standing, and hence, enormous level of privilege, required to be able to 
eventually go public. Many of the other victims do not have this privilege. 
Whether due to marginalisation, fear of retailiation, or being new to our 
communities, many sexual assault victims require anonymity, because — without 
anonymity — they would be silenced.

Jake never apologised to me, nor — to my knowledge — any of the other victims. 
I don’t condone his actions. However, and no apologies for being crass, I can’t 
seem to motivate myself to feel any pity towards him for any of the admittedly 
horrible things which are now happening to him. He ruined lives. The number of 
people we would have in a significantly more productive and less damaged state 
were it not for his actions is substantial, and futher, those people in a less 
damaged state would be overall substantially more beneficial than having a Jake 
in a less damaged state. Additionally, we would likely have had more diverse 
contributors to Tor, if we had dealt with Jake sooner, since, for years, many 
people have been warned about Jake through a whisper network and disuaded from 
becoming involved.

There are some differences between how Jake is behaving to how the other 
anarchist I mentioned above was behaving. The other anarchist was willing to 
engage in the defined process, respectful of his victims’ needs, and eventually 
sincerely apologetic for his actions.

I cannot condone his actions; however, I cannot condone violence and threats 
against Jake. Full stop. That is not productive. If he is further harmed, we 
never see the end of the wretched abused-abuser cycle.

People who behave as Jake does are sick, and they need help. Often, it is 
because they were severely hurt at some point. As the activist adage goes, “We 
need to be gentle with one another, so that we can be dangerous together.” If 
we think Jake has any capacity for change, then it is our responsibility to 
ensure that he is not simply swept under a rug of academia where he will most 
certainly find a deeply-ingrained institutional structure of rape apologists 
ready to turn a blind eye and willing to help Jake “fail up” to another 
position of power and credibility, where he will use that power to commit 
further acts of abuse. I am thoroughly dismayed for what is statistically 
likely to happen again, causing harm to and trust issues for their students, 
and professional and reputational issues for them.


Realpolitiking

Now. For all of you screaming “This is not what justice looks like! Why don’t 
you just go to the police?!” let me just wax realpolitik and, like a good 
little German, quote some Gesetz and cite some statistics.

The “due process” of a state court, in my case, will be detrimental to both 
Jake and I, as well as numerous other people. The law is very clearly against 
both of us in this case, with the overwhelmingly likely outcome that he would 
be kicked out of Germany. (Additionally, in Germany, multiple independent 
allegations can result in a conviction given the absense of other evidence.)

The other outcome is one or more convictions. While convictions for rape and 
sexual assault are statistically unlikely, given that only about 7% of reported 
rapes result in a conviction with similar numbers for Germany, we have an 
advantage. By German case law, multiple independent allegations are very likely 
to result in conviction(s), even despite the absense of other evidence, e.g. 
bruises, marks, semen, which would be required in a solitary allegation. If 
brought to court, here are some of the applicable laws and their corresponding 
minimum/maximum prison terms:

Forest

    * One count of rape (§177 of the Strafsgesetzbuch paragraph 1) for a person 
in an unconscious state or otherwise incapable of verbal disagreement or 
resistance (§179 of the Strafsgesetz): minimum, one year; maximum, ten years.
    * One count of blackmail: minimum, none; maximum: five years.

River

    * One count of rape (§177 of the Strafsgesetzbuch paragraph 1), including
    * Instructing a third party to rape the victim (§177 of the 
Strafsgesetzbuch paragraph 2, sentence 2), making it a “severe case”,
    * Both counts were penetrative intercourse (§177 of the Strafsgesetzbuch 
paragraph 2, sentence 1), also making it a “severe case”,
    * The victim was additionally in an unconscious state and uncapable of 
verbal or physical resistance (§179 of the Strafsgesetz, including paragraph 5, 
as well as paragraph 5 sentence 2): minimum: two years; maximum: ten years.

Sam

    * Sexual assault (§177 of the Strafsgesetzbuch paragraph 1): minimum, one 
year; maximum: ten years.

Totalling to four years minimum and thirty-five years maximum for those cases 
alone, along with potential fines and reparations, and expulsion from the 
country afterwards (cf. §53 and §54 of the Aufenthaltsgesetz). (For English 
speakers curious about the German laws I’m referencing, there are also official 
English translations.)

Not to mention that, if our goal is to prevent more people from being harmed by 
Jake, prison is not an option. Overwhelmingly likely, even in Germany, Jake 
would be raped in prison. I do not wish these painful things I’ve gone through 
on anyone, not even those who have caused me pain. Further, most abusers have a 
history of having been abused at some point in their past, and Jake going to 
prison certainly will not help him amend his behaviour.


Alternatives

Some people are asking what the victims want out of this.

Personally, I would be completely ecstatic if Jake decided to move to Alaska. 
Forever. Jake is still threatening the other victims to try to keep them quiet, 
and additional reports of extremely severe sexual assaults and rape are pouring 
in to The Tor Project. Meanwhile, Jake is preparing some sort of public 
“apology” statement. Alaska, or northern Siberia — it doesn’t matter. Until his 
sociopathic behaviours are revised, there is no place for him in civil society.

As it is obviously rather untenable that Jake move to Alaska, I suggest the 
following. Please note that these are my suggestions alone, and do not 
necessarily at this point in time reflect those of all of the other victims. 
We’re all still processing this.

    1. We need to entirely remove abusers from our communities, until such a 
time as they have sufficiently demonstrated to their victims that their abusive 
behaviours will no longer continue. Jake should be removed from all places 
where his victims, their loved ones, and friends might come into any form of 
contact with him. Given the enormous amounts of pain myself and the other 
victims have gone through, the draining emotional stress, and (please excuse my 
rather dark humour) the development time wasted, I am not willing to revisit 
this issue for at least four years. After that time has passed, it may be 
possible to reassess whether there is any path forward for Jake.

    2. We need to assess the cultural issues within our communities which 
require that victims report anonymously, due to fears of retaliation, further 
abuse, and not being taken seriously. Once identified, we need to devise better 
reporting and support structures to help allay these fears.

    3. We need to take victims’ stories seriously. It should not be required 
that victims band together in collectives in order to be heard. Nor should it 
be required that someone who stands up for others must have and share their own 
story of victimisation to “prove” the credibility of the others, as was my 
case. It should not be required that a dozen people are harmed before any one 
of them is taken seriously.

    4. We need to critique the institutions — sociocultural, academic, and 
organisational — which made these events possible.

    5. Those who must still have some form of contact with Jake, and by that I 
primarily mean others within the academic and journalistic communities, need to 
be given ways to raise safety and ethical concerns without fear of retribution 
or retaliation. It is my understanding that several researchers and students do 
not currently feel this way, and that this is having a severe impact upon their 
abilities to be successful and productive.

Lastly, I would like to say that I’ve never been prouder to work for The Tor 
Project, as their recent actions to stand against abuse have set nothing short 
of an exemplary model for other organisations.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Reply via email to