I think its great that u can download it, and if u like it u will/can buy it :)
Conrad Rockenhaus <[email protected]> skrev: (26 juli 2016 22:47:43 CEST) >Just a short answer to your rant - you are correct about the embrace >of >mp3. Had they done it sooner, they would of banked in quite a bit of >money. > >Regards, > >Conrad Rockenhaus > >On 2016-07-25 09:44, Friet Pan wrote: >> Sounds a bit like the war on drugs. >> >> They refuse to look at the cause of the problem, but jump around the >> effect like their pants are on fire. >> >> oooo the effect is sooooooooo scary, but refuse to see that THEY are >> the ones who caused it. >> >> In case of the music industry, they ignored MP3, then they ignored, >> napster and co. then they sued napster when the damage was done and >> out of control. >> >> >> If they had embraced MP3 in the very beginning, and had ran their own >> donwload sites at fair prices, then there would not have been a need >> for pirates, it wouldn't even make sense. >> >> But the music industry is greedy, and always wants MORE profit, so >> they make stuff artificially expensive and then moan that people give >> copies to their friends. I have an insane record collection, and when >> i download a track that i already own on Vinyl, on CD, or on BOTH, >> then they still want MORE money, i already paid the damn thing TWICE, >> so why is it a problem to download it?. Is it illegal? NO. Then why >> moan about it? >> And if there is no money in making music, then why do studio's still >> record music?, Why do record labels still produce music? If there was >> no profit then there would be no product. They still make music, and >> still make a living. And now people try before they buy, they >> download, and find new music that the industry does not promote on >the >> radio. And more artist make a chance to make money, all over the >> world, not in a small region. >> >> So that part is one big lie. Torrents do more music promotion then >> what radio ever accomplished. >> >> >> But thats off topic i guess... I had to say something about it. It's >> just silly. >> >> >> If you want fame in the 21th century, then make sure you have a >> torrent available. And you can make yourself more popular then >> 21thcentury fox can do for you with all the money in the world. >> >> And for TAX it doesn't matter, Servers make TAX, advertisment makes >> TAX, Concerts make TAX, more then ever before. >> >> I'm not promoting piracy, i'm only saying that the music industy is >> barking up the wrong tree, torrents SELL MUSIC and without the need >of >> bribing corrupt radio hosts.. It's cheaper then radio. >> >> The other topic have similar answers, movie industry is a bit >> different, buy they could have used torrent as a distribution >> mechanism, and made money without expensive servers and datapipes. >> >> It's their own mistake, and now they need someone to blame. So if TOR >> can protect people who are human and share their cooking recipes then >> that's all good. Without sharing data the human race would be more >> like a bunch of chimps fighting over a branch. If the music industry >> manages to put us in a zoo where we need to pay to look outside, then >> we are like chimps in a boring zoo without any visitors. >> >> thats not human.... >> >> Damn, i got pissed.... My apologies for my ranting... i'll buy some >> music next week... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> >> A new report published by the European Union Intellectual Property >> Office .... > >-- >tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] >To unsubscribe or change other settings go to >https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- Sincerly Flipchan -- tor-talk mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
