Conspiracy analysts [un]cover areas coders, users, officials, and media don't or won't... which can be a useful part of any ecosystem. They could be considered leakers, but instead of leaking facts, they present hard questions to be [dis]proved... the limbo area of untested hypothesis before a proven conclusion is reached. So I don't mind them much as long as it's generally thoughtful, plausible, and is a commensurately low fraction of traffic.
The angry abusive troll accounts that pop up namecalling and shittalking are a bit much though. Thankfully they're quite rare and die off on their own, even before censorship was deployed. And of course any news or controversial aspect of any project is going to have at least some talk associated with it. That's normal. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk