On 1/5/15 12:15 PM, Virgil Griffith wrote: > Tor welcomes a diversity of users, and I recognize that both > jurisdictions and personal risk tolerances vary. However, as a > historical matter, this was the consensus we three came to. That's probably one of the most important point, where different jurisdictions along with different personal risk tolerance shall be taken into account by the Tor2web software, to enable volunteers to run Tor2web nodes with such differentiated approach.
That way "the software provide different options" but it's up to the operator to choose, based on his jurisdiction and personal risk tolerance, much like with a Tor Exit Policy. The interesting point is that, with the public knowledge of the filter lists being shared and properly categorized, each node could apply it's own personal policy, bringing the responsibility up the individual choice of the operator. If i'm a Tor2web newcomer and i trust Mr. X and Mr. Y that i know only apply blocklist for CP and Malware, i would be happy to import their blocklist, because i'm following a trust-chain. So differentiated strategies to better categorize the blocklist and to import them directly or on a consensus basis, would enable different "personal risk tolerance" to be applied to the matter. Fabio _______________________________________________ Tor2web-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.globaleaks.org/mailman/listinfo/tor2web-talk
