I agreed with you. :) sorry I was tacitly concenting... Brian --- "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > just a quick question: I posted comments for two > checkins lately: One > about that ugly != null checking by jmcnally which I > voted down, the > other about the IOException -> SAXException change > by Martin which I > still consider unncecessary because the IOException > is allowed by the > interface and just because "Eclipse says, this is a > bug" changing a > valid statement is not really an explanation to me. > > There was _zero_ response. Zero discussion. Both > comments got > "silently ignored". No "well, I do this, because ... > " or "you're > right, we should..." or "you suck, go away...". > Nothing. Can we please > discuss at least a little such controversial changes > (discussing them > after they got in is fine, we can revert them > anyway)? Else this feels > like talking to a wall. Some disconnected developers > scribble on the > code but no real communication happens. > > Regards > Henning > > -- > Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen > INTERMETA GmbH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 > http://www.intermeta.de/ > > Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web > Services > freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development > -- hero for hire > > "You are being far too rational for this > discussion." > --- Scott Robert Ladd in > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
