Hi Scott,

was my fault - I'm stuck behind a firewall where SSH works but not port 2401 ... :-(

Thanks,

Siegfried Goeschl


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Eade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:20 PM
To: Apache Torque Developers List
Subject: Re: Village API: Doing unprepared SELECT before UPDATE and how
to fix it


Instructions for accessing the Village source are at:

    http://share.whichever.com/index.php?SCREEN=village

I just tested anonymous access and it works fine for me.

Scott

-- 
Scott Eade
Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd.
http://www.backstagetech.com.au


G�schl,Siegfried wrote:

>Hi folks,
>
>I had a look at the discussion about Village API using an unprepared SELECT statement 
>before doing an UPDATE which could potentially crash an ORACLE database. And the 
>Oracle DBA are not particularly nice around here if you crash a production database 
>... :-)
>
>1) I'm currently using Torque 3.1 with Oracle 9i
>
>2) I'm not able to get the Village source code since the CVS server is not 
>running/down/whatsoever.
>
>3) The trouble is located in DataSet.fetchRecords(int,int) - I don't know if this is 
>easy to fix since I only have decompiled source code and the JAR which my WSAD 
>doesn't like stepping through (I know real programmers don't use a debugger ... core 
>dump is just fine)
>3.1) TableDataSet.fetchRecords() builds a select string using its member variables 
>and delegates the work to DataSet.fetchRecord() 
>3.2) DataSet.fetchRecord() has no other chance than to execute the plain select 
>statement since the parameters are hold in the derived class TableDataSet
>3.3) IMHO TableDataSet.fetchRecords() could implement the functionality on its own 
>using a prepared statement (aka copy/paste from the base class)
>3.4) It would be a rather small change - definitely less work than dumping Village as 
>proposed by Henning Schmiedehausen ... ;-)
>
>4) I can't say if this solution has any unwanted side effects on existing TORQUE 
>installations - is there a regression test available similiar to OJB?!
>
>5) I also don't know if I'm looking at an obsolete problem or at a problem where a 
>simple workaround exists. I went through the mailing lists but I'm not a TORQUE 
>and/or ORACLE guru hence the posting to both mailing lists.
>
>6) Are there any databases which go belly up using tons of prepared statements?! 
>Wouldn't make much sense to crash all the other databases just to fix an Oracle 
>issue. A hardcore solution would be checking the class name of the database 
>connection if it could be a Oracle database being used ... but even thinking about it 
>hurts.
>
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Siegfried Goeschl
>  
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to