Hi, I have made a lot of fixes to the code to support fully qualified names and I am thinking of comitting to the CVS ina different branch ..but i still have no time to make corresponding docs to the changes have made ... anyway I use successfully fully qualified names with postgres
To Developers: Is it possible for me to create a branch ? to upload the fully qualified names and the SERIAL type ( sql proper generation and reverse (jdbc goal)) in postgres. I have a lot of fixes in the code and I have developed new packages to support data representation/manipulation code (stuff like representing of nested objects, authorizing across all the data model mechanisms etc.) What do you think , should I be able to commit to the CVS ? Thanx, Bogdan ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:03 AM Subject: Torque TODO List Regarding Fully Qualified Table Names > Hi- > > I've checked the web site but I'm wondering if it's on the to-do list to add > fully qualified table functionality to Torque in the near future. > > It seems as though many users have opted out of using Torque primarily due > to this reason. I too have been checking over the last year hoping that > this feature would be integrated. > > Any thoughts? > > Michael > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
