Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I will apply this for 3.1.1, but it would have been easier if you had
>provided a patch against cvs rather than against your version that
>includes the boolean getter patch that I don't see going in as part of
>3.1.1 (3.1.2-dev is more acceptable I think). I assume there will be
>some corresponding changes to ObjectWithManager.vm (I know you don't use
>it, but some do).
Whoops, sorry. Shall I redo it against 3.1.1-HEAD?
Regads
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
deserves to be on this list of the top five problems."
-- Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
Open Source Software Development"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
