On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Greg Monroe wrote:
I was browsing the issues in Jira and noticed that quite a few major one
are actually Village related. Seems like a "psuedo-component" for Village
might make identifying these much easier. (so they can be block resolved
with 4.0...lol).
This is a good idea. I'll do that.
I've been meaning to get back to Torque-50 (Add-on support) and look at
what Thomas suggested (and may have already implimented). Of course, I'll
sign up for any work needed for Torque-54 - 8)
TORQUE-50 is committed except for the docs explaining how to submit
add-ons back to Torque. Can you check whether this works as you
intended ?
I'll try to get TORQUE-54 in and then use this experience to modify the
text about how to submit add-ons.
If there's time, I might take a wack at Torque-27 (DB specific options)
by adding support for a <OPTION key=.. value=> XML element that was
talked about in an dev e-mail thread a while back. This would require
a change to the DTD to add it, any problems with that?
In my opinion no problem if the DTD remains backwards-compatible.
Let me know if I can help on any other issues, docs, etc.
When we are ready to put out the RC, it would be nice if a few people
would glance through the docs to see whether the information provided is
still up-to-date.
Thomas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
