Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Greg Monroe wrote:
>> Well the SF project is listed as Apache 2.0, but just like
>> the Maven-plugin project, any SF.net approved Open source
>> license will do (all the common modern day one...).
>>
>IMO it would be a mistake to go with anything other than ASL 2.0. But
>let's not start that discussion here :-)
I would actually look for my DB PMC hat, dust it off and -1 any move
away from ASL 2.0.
I was AWOL for a while. Is there any special reason (license wise,
because that is the only one I can think of) why these add-ons went to
sf.net?
Opening a sandbox for that kind of stuff in DB should be easy and with
the labs.apache.org now in place, that might be a good place, too.
Best regards
Henning
--
Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux,
91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person
Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | Velocity - Turbine guy
"Save the cheerleader. Save the world."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
