Thomas Fischer wrote: > There is no particular reason why the joins are initialized as null and > not as empty list. If you want to change that, please go ahead.
Ok, I'll do that. This would also mean to roll back the stuff to fix TORQUE-90, because joins would never be null, agreed? Looks somehow more regular... Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
