As we want to replace anyway, I'd suggest to start this. I would like to
create a branch for removing village from Torque. Some time ago, Thomas V
has suggested to use commons-sql instead; I'd second that. I'd volunteer to
do the village removal, but I reckon this will take me some months.
If Thomas V wants to pursue the integration of village into torque further,
the branch approach guarantees that this effort can also be pursued
further.
What do you think ?
Thomas
"Jean T. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 15.08.2007 03:58:39:
> Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > did that code grant materialize? I wasn't following too closely.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Henning
>
> It doesn't look like it has been recorded in grants.txt yet. (I also
> checked cclas.txt, just in case it got recorded there instead, but it
> isn't there.)
>
> Any suggestion on how to proceed?
>
> -jean
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]