Thomas Vandahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 16.10.2007 09:11:45:
> Two questions remain (probably more will surface later):
> - What version should we give to the "integrated" Village? 2.0? 3.3?

I'd prefer 3.3 here.

> - I'd propose to put the resulting jar into the Maven repository in the
>    "torque" group or "org.apache.torque" respectively. What do others
>    say?

m1:torque, m2:org.apache.torque is good.

    Thomas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to