> Hello, I'm new to the dev list, so I hope I'm not going to say something > that doesn't make sense. > For what I read the Torque 4 web site already exists and has only to be > deployed
Unfortunately not, a bit of work is still needed. But it is pretty far. > If I well understand Torque 4 is quite a major rewriting of the 3.3 > version. We can think the 3.3 will stay in use for some time and the > versions should have the same dignity in some way. Hm, probably you are right once torque 4 gains speed. But at the moment it is less than a patchwork, so personally I'd put more weight on Torque 3.3. > If my hypothesis are correct, to me the best solution is the one adopted > by Tapestry apache site: > > http://tapestry.apache.org/ > > As you see there are two stable versions that are linked from a common > web site where something about the common parts of the project are > explained than there are two separate web sites. Yes, I think that the tapestry approach is a very clean one. Probably we can adopt it at a later stage when torque 4 is more mature, but for now my preference would be to use torque 3.3 as the main page.... Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
