Since I have not been able to participate in the dev process I will stay agnostic with respect to an alpha1 release. But.....
Il 26/09/2010 19.49, Thomas Fischer ha scritto: > If we do this, we still need to think about a set of supported databases. > As I have written before, I'd prefer that we only officially support > databases where we test the integration. This would mean to drop the > non-supported platform and adapter implementations. > I am prepared to test mysql, oracle, postgresql, derby (and mssql if I > must), but I will not do more than that (administrating test databases > which I do not use personally frustrates me, and I personally only use > mysql and oracle). > It depends on what Torque devs aim at: 1) keep the software update for their own use: then the answer is support only the one that devs want to be supported 2) spread the verb of Torque around the world: then the answer is no, then the answer is support all the db that devs are operatively able to test (obtaining a licence, install it, etc etc) 3) keep the larger possible user base: in this case devs should ask the community and then see if the requests for asked dbs are satisfiable with the available manpower For what I have understood of the Torque community, I think that adopting 1) will not encounter many objections by the community. -- ================================================== dott. Ivano Mario Luberti Archimede Informatica societa' cooperativa a r. l. Sede Operativa Via Gereschi 36 - 56126- Pisa tel.: +39-050- 580959 tel/fax: +39-050-9711344 web: www.archicoop.it ================================================== --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
