Thomas Vandahl wrote:
>On 09.06.12 05:44, [email protected] wrote: > - public static TorqueInstance getInstance() > + public static synchronized TorqueInstance getInstance() Yikes. This is tough. Are you absolutely sure this is necessary? No, thinking again about it, it is not necessary from a practical point of view. I was mislead by the synchronized setter of TorqueInstance. I have removed the synchronization from both the getter and the setter (r1348578). Thanks for noting, Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
