On 26.08.12 12:44, Thomas Fox wrote: > Thomas V, please check whether the solution is ok for you. Personally, I > believe that even the setters for table map, database name and record > mapper can be removed from BasePeerImpl.
I just chose to call the other constructor. Other than that, all is fine. I'd leave the setters in for orthogonality of the interface and the possibility to override them (if you want to do additional checks, for example) Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
