[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102862#comment-14102862
]
Rob Decker edited comment on TORQUE-317 at 8/19/14 9:19 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
I have torque.om.complexObjectModel=true.
I did "fix" the problem after reading the updates. Thanks for the hint Thomas.
It seems #if ($torqueGen.option("torque.om.complexObjectModel")) was actually
what working for adding the methods and #if
($torqueGen.booleanOption("torque.om.complexObjectModel")) was preventing the
field references from getting added.
I tried adding #if ($complexObjectModel == "true") but it didn't work. Maybe
there is some underlying problem with setting complexObjectModel. I double
checked that I am setting it correctly before the generation.
Here's the patch that made it work for me:
{noformat}
---
torque-templates-4.0-orig/org/apache/torque/templates/om/templates/bean/base/baseBean.vm
2014-05-14 16:57:24.186114541 -0400
+++
torque-templates-4.0-new/org/apache/torque/templates/om/templates/bean/base/baseBean.vm
2014-08-19 16:52:48.000000000 -0400
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
$torqueGen.mergepoint("fieldDefinitions")
##
## field definitions for referenced objects
-#if ($torqueGen.booleanOption("torque.om.complexObjectModel"))
+#if ($torqueGen.option("torque.om.complexObjectModel"))
$torqueGen.mergepoint("fieldDefinitionsReferencedObjects")
##
## field definitions for referencing objects
{noformat}
was (Author: rdecker):
I have torque.om.complexObjectModel=true.
I did "fix" the problem after reading the updates. Thanks for the hint Thomas.
It seems #if ($torqueGen.option("torque.om.complexObjectModel")) was actually
what working for adding the methods and #if
($torqueGen.booleanOption("torque.om.complexObjectModel")) was preventing the
field references from getting added.
I tried adding #if ($complexObjectModel == "true") but it didn't work. Maybe
there is some underlying problem with setting complexObjectModel. I double
checked that I am setting it correctly before the generation.
Here's the patch that made it work for me:
---
torque-templates-4.0-orig/org/apache/torque/templates/om/templates/bean/base/baseBean.vm
2014-05-14 16:57:24.186114541 -0400
+++
torque-templates-4.0-new/org/apache/torque/templates/om/templates/bean/base/baseBean.vm
2014-08-19 16:52:48.000000000 -0400
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
$torqueGen.mergepoint("fieldDefinitions")
##
## field definitions for referenced objects
-#if ($torqueGen.booleanOption("torque.om.complexObjectModel"))
+#if ($torqueGen.option("torque.om.complexObjectModel"))
$torqueGen.mergepoint("fieldDefinitionsReferencedObjects")
##
## field definitions for referencing objects
> BaseBean does generate fields for referencing objects
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TORQUE-317
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-317
> Project: Torque
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Templates
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Environment: Centos 6.4, Java 8
> Reporter: Rob Decker
> Assignee: Thomas Fox
> Priority: Critical
>
> In the baseBean.vm template the field definitions for referenced objects
> mergepoints are present but the generated beans do not contain the fields.
> The methods do properly reference the fields but the code does not compile
> because the field declarations are missing.
> ## field definitions for referenced objects
> #if ($torqueGen.booleanOption("torque.om.complexObjectModel"))
> $torqueGen.mergepoint("fieldDefinitionsReferencedObjects")
> ##
> ## field definitions for referencing objects
> $torqueGen.mergepoint("fieldDefinitionsReferencingObjects")
> #end
> I am not familiar enough with templates to figure why it isn't working.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
