Hi, list!
Scott Eade wrote:
Peter Boheme wrote:As I replied earlier, I did put together a small example. Has anyone checked it out? It's at http://users.volja.net/amanita1.
My opinion is that if after waging battle for two days you could find a couple of hours to document what you have learned either to the list or on the wiki it would help move things in the right direction. If you provide no feedback as to the specific problems you have encountered then nothing can be done to address them.Last 2 days i spend much of my time in these several xml/properties files. For me, this tool is very hard to use, even with your helpful advices on that mailing-list. Reading the archive of this mailing-list, let assume me other users of torque have similiar problems.
I think there are three possibilities why. 1. I am new two Torque 2. I am to silly to use it 3. The usage of Torgue is to complicated.
Even if 1 & 2 is right, i think a good tool should be usable by a guy like me. Especially for Torque cause it comes in version 3.1 and not 0.9. Another reason is: we are living in the 3rd millennium...
Whats your opinion ?
Anyone and everyone is welcome and encouraged to contribute documentation. If torque works for you, why not return the favour and invest a few hours improving things.
Scott
Is it to complicated to follow? Should I explain it in more details? Is it to big? Is it misleading or incorrect? Comment on it, please.
BR, Ales.
PS: I also encourage you to polish the English as it is not my native language.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
