I am curious about that mail list is being silent for the last 3-4 days.Mailing lists can be quiet for many reasons, usually because people are just plain busy with other things.
I have some issues concerning the OM templates.If you want to make changes to support some new feature that you need then go ahead and make them - this is the beauty of Open Source. You can if you like contribute your patches back for review and possible acceptance into Torque. The itch you are scratching may well be very different to the itches being scratched by others so if you can provide test code that illustrates your new features and shows them to work without causing problems elsewhere then this will greatly increase the chances of having them accepted into Torque.
I suppose they need serious fixup for the multiple schema style of working.
I need some comment of the designers/creators of the velocity templates(torque model itself).
Is there going to ba e new release soon that might fix the problems.If so ..then when ?
If not ..what do you suppose me to do ? ..
I am almost sure what has to be changed in Object.vm and Peer.vm
but I need your comments guys. I am not going to change these on my own. Although I have made a lot of fixes in the templates
in my dist I am not sure whether I have complete understanding of the torque OM model. Therefore I need some of the designers to help a little.
If you need answers to specific questions then go ahead and ask them. If you don't get an answer then it may be that others are unfamiliar with the area you are asking about or are simply too busy with other things to respond.
Scott
-- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
