The database name is currently stored in the schema.xml file. This requires that I define the database name in two places: in my build.properties and in schema.xml. Notably, the developers change the database name in build.properties and, of course, the build will fail: the name in build.properties is not leading.
The database name is not really part of the schema. I can create the same schema several times with different names. I would like to propose that the 'name' attribute in schema.xml be optional instead of required. If it's there it will be used (preserving backward compatibility) otherwise the Ant task needs to supply the name. (Or maybe, supplying a name throught the Ant task could overrule the name in schema.xml?) Not supplying a name at all would be an error. Thoughts? Thanks, Hilco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
