Will Glass-Husain wrote: > I'm a little surprised the JDBC driver class is hard coded in torque. > (I'm not really a Torque maven). Can some one else comment? Is > setting the adapter a substitute for Torque auto-recognizing the > driver class?
This is not the recommended method to configure Torque although setting a driver Torque knows about is indeed a possible way to select a database adapter. However you can add any driver you want and even roll your own adapter if you like/must. >> But it does sound like SQL server 2005 is not an officially supported >> DB for the project. Well, you did not even say which Torque version you use. 3.3 contains some MS specific extensions... Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
