On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Ted Pavlic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The "update to new tip" is meant to take effect after pulling, i.e. > > hg pull --update. But Fetch expects the repo to be at tip. > > > > I guess we can make the options mutually exclusive if necessary. > > > > Either that or make "update to new tip" mean something different when "do
Maybe "update to new tip pulled" will be slightly less confusing? > fetch" is ALSO checked. That sort of conditional explanation probably isn't > worth the confusion. I originally wanted to make "Fetch" a button by itself, but later decide on making it an option of Pull instead, since functionally it's a extension of pull. But after reading what you said, maybe having a Fetch button will be better. > The little "update to tip" button that shows up in the bottom of > Synchronize provides an easy way to deal with the "problem" of having to > update before fetch. However, especially because of the similarities in the > wording, it's easy to overlook. Any suggestion of improving the design on the buttons, in terms of layout, wording, etc? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
