On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Shawn Hoover <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:35 PM, TK Soh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to seek your opinions on one matter.
>>
>> I recently added the 'ms' column and several context menus to support
>> the resolve command in the commit & status window. While I tried to
>> make the context menu stay as close to the Mercurial's description as
>> possible, I am beginning to feel that the phrase "unmark files as
>> resolved" (implemented as the 'unmark as resolved' menu) look a little
>> confusing. I feel that it would be clearer to just say 'mark [files]
>> as unresolved'. After all, resolve's help text does state that 'U =
>> unresolved'.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
>
> I searched mercurial-devel for a reason as to why the current wording was
> chosen, but there didn't seem to be a good reason. "mark as unresolved" is
> clearer, and, as you suggested, makes sense with the "U = unresolved"
> status.
> Shawn

That's +4 in total, so I will go ahead with it. Thanks. :-)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop

Reply via email to