On or about 2009 Jan 14, at 12:34 AM, TK Soh indited: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Abdul Halim wrote: >> Neh.. It is not the habit.. It is the environment. Especially, when >> the customer >> is beside you breathing down your neck. Guess I have to stick to >> Qct then. > > Unfortunately.
ok, so one of the "we can't get rid of Qct until ...." items was a record like option. Another (I thought) option was a GUI interface over 'shelve'. I was hoping that we could have both, built, I further hope, over top of a common "hunk selection" engine. hg record and Qct both have this functionality because it satisfies a need. I think it is a bit premature to say that since shelve provides the same mechanism that therefore it satisfies the same need. Yes, there are times when I want to have 2 or 3 shelves that I can manage as I bounce around a tree making "emergency/critical" fixes. Yes, there are times when I have a big hunk of stuff and what I want to do is just commit it in pieces. Both of those situations involve the same underlying technology, but using one _interface_ to that technology for both isn't effective. --Doug ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
