On 27.10.2009 17:25, Steve Borho wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Adrian Buehlmann <adr...@cadifra.com> wrote: >> On 27.10.2009 02:59, Steve Borho wrote: >>> It looks like hg-1.4 is going to be about a week late, so thg-0.9 will >>> slip out accordingly. Let's go ahead and institute a string freeze >>> today and give the translators a full two weeks to catch up. I'd like >>> to spend the extra time working on bug fixes and documentation. >>> >> Can we have stable merged into default? >> >> Or is development for after 0.9 halted until 0.9 is released? >> > > As soon as we need a default branch, I'll fork it off of stable. > There's not much point in doing this until there are patches pending > for it. >
Forking default off stable seems strange to me. This means you will have a disconnected default branch. I suggest to merge stable into default now, this would allow to continue development for after 0.9. There is no problem continuing on stable for 0.9. Merging stable into default doesn't mean this ends stable. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
