On 30.11.2009 01:56, Steve Borho wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Adrian Buehlmann <adr...@cadifra.com> wrote: >> On 29.11.2009 20:35, Adrian Buehlmann wrote: >>> There, it is now awaiting future "infections" by the new feature stream >>> in default. Until the whole surprise package gets pushed out on >>> Feb 1st :) (and until then, the whole package is mostly ignored by the >>> majority of the users. Because we told them it is "unstable"). >> Just noticed: 0.10 will be March, 1st 2010 (not Feb 1st). >> >> So unless the Windows shell cmenu fixes are backported to the stable branch, >> they will appear in a release on March, 1st earliest. > > Are you lobbying for them to make it into 0.9.1?
Partly. Also analyzing and trying to improve our workflows. > They do fix a number of bugs, so this is an option. Yes. The shell extension fixes for the cmenu should go into a bugfix release of 0.9. They should have gone into stable from the beginning. Problem is: I can't test it on Windows 7 final (I don't have that here). So if you can test it on Windows 7 final, then I'm all for squeezing it into 0.9.1. I can do the testing on Windows XP 32 and Vista 64 Business. And if we really should manage to screw up 0.9.1 (just in case, I don't expect that to happen), we can still do a quick 0.9.2. Or we delay 0.9.1 for a couple of days until an RC has been tested by others. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
